Wednesday, June 30, 2010

No Talent !

I saw this was thinking that our preimer was playing 52 card pick up with out any cards. The lack of talent Brad Wall has is very scarey. If was not for Rob Norris and Ken Krawetrz to former liberals.Talent pool is very small. Read this and tell me what you think?

Sask. gets new finance minister
Last Updated: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 |

There are two newcomers to the cabinet table after Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall shuffled his cabinet. (CBC)

Deputy Premier Ken Krawetz is Saskatchewan's new finance minister following a major cabinet shuffle on Tuesday.

Among the biggest changes announced by Premier Brad Wall: Environment Minister Nancy Heppner and Finance Minister Rod Gantefoer are now out of cabinet.

Wall also sent Regina MLA Christine Tell to the back benches on Tuesday.

Newcomers to cabinet include Regina's Laura Ross and Lloydminster's Tim McMillan.

And former cabinet minister Darryl Hickie is back after a spell away from the cabinet table.

Krawetz, formerly the education minister as well as Wall's deputy, replaces Gantefoer in the finance portfolio. Gantefoer announced earlier this month he wasn't going to run in the 2011 provincial election. As a result, some pundits and legislature watchers were expecting him to be out of cabinet Tuesday.

Perhaps more of a surprise was Wall dropping high-profile Martensville MLA Heppner. As environment minister, Heppner was under fire from the NDP Opposition for both her government's climate change policies and a controversial bill that could allow environmentally sensitive Crown land to be sold.

McMillan, who made a name for himself in the past year as a champion of endangered wild ponies, will be the minister responsible for the Crown Investments Corporation, while Ross is government services minister.

Hickie, who left cabinet a year ago following a sometimes rocky stint as corrections, public safety and policing minister when there were several high-profile escapes and accidental releases from jails, becomes municipal affairs minister.

Donna Harpauer becomes education minister, handing her social services portfolio to longtime colleague June Draude.

The First Nations and Métis relations portfolio goes to Ken Cheveldayoff. Bill Hutchinson moves from there to tourism, while Tourism Minister Dustin Duncan is promoted to environment.

Wall says with these changes, 24 of his 37 government colleagues will have served in cabinet. He said earlier this month it's expected this will be the final cabinet shuffle before the election on Nov. 7, 2011.

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Something to think about

June 29
Talking about Chernobyl still 'urgent' threat on anniversary: Ukraine
Something that caught my eye as I think about the home land of my father and mother. Ukraine problems make me think how lucky we are in Canada. Also we can learn from these problems as Saskatchewan looks at different ways to get engery as we grow in Saskatchewan.


Chernobyl still 'urgent' threat on anniversary: Ukraine

The plant's fourth nuclear reactor still presents an active danger after work to replace an aging sarcophagus around the facility was delayed due to a shortage of funds last year, Yanukovych said according to a statement.


The problem "is urgent not only for Ukraine but also for our neighbours," he said.


"We must of course unite our partners, donors and all our neighbours around the question because it is highly dangerous."


The atomic fallout from the 1986 accident at Chernobyl, when one of the reactors exploded, spread to neighbouring European states, leaving some two million people still suffering from contamination, Yanukovych said.


"There are still more than two million people suffering from harmful effects of radiation exposure, of whom 498,000 are children," he said.


The death toll from the Chernobyl disaster is bitterly disputed, with a United Nations toll from 2005 setting it at just 4,000, but non-governmental groups suggesting the true toll could reach tens or even hundreds of thousands.


According to Ukrainian official figures, more than 25,000 people known as "liquidators" from then-Soviet Ukraine, Russia and Belarus have died since taking part in the bid to limit radioactive fallout after the catastrophe.


Many children and adolescents touched by the nuclear fallout have suffered from thyroid cancer — the most common illness from the radiation.


While the Chernobyl power plant was finally closed in 2000, the dead reactor is still a threat because the concrete cover hastily laid over some 200 tonnes of spilled radioactive material is cracking.

© Copyright (c) CW Media Inc.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Think big saskatchewan

I saw this , I thought I would comment. it time we in Saskatchewan start thinking that we are a have provinice and deal with issues as the big guys would. Stop the negative and start thinking postive. We are are going up here is some facts for you.

Canada's population has gone past the 34-million mark.
Stats Canada estimates the population was 34,019,000 on April 1.
That's an increase of just over 88 thousand, from Jan. 1.
As of April 1st, Saskatchewan's population was estimated at 1,041,700. That's a 0.36% gain and the second highest growth rate among the provinces. This was our largest first quarter population increase since 1972. The growth is attributed mostly to interprovincial in-migration and international migration.

Friday, June 25, 2010

couple things that caught my eye

Both of thiese articles from small local newspapers, which our major newspaper didnot mention. Why is that?

One-Way Trip
Stephen LaRose
Published Thursday June 17, 09:38 am

Saskatchewan migratory birds face a deadly winter in Gulf Of Mexico


Spewing from 40,000 to 100,000 barrels of unrefined crude oil a day into the Gulf of Mexico, the wellhead has resisted several efforts by the wellsite owner, British Petroleum, to cap its flow. As of June 14 (press time), 39 million gallons of oil have spewed unchecked into the Gulf of Mexico.

Some in the oil drilling industry now say that the wellhead could still be discharging into the open sea by Christmas.


The blowout has been partly contained by a steel cap and riser pipe that’s diverting some of the oil to an oil tanker ship on the surface. From June 10 to 14, the amount of oil captured this way has gone from about 6,000 barrels a day up to almost 15,000 barrels a day.


The oil slick stretches nearly 3,500 kilometers, and has or will wash ashore in four states — Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida. Many shoreline areas contain nesting areas for migratory birds which spend their summers in Saskatchewan.


What kind of winter home will they find when they return?


Disgust and sadness permeates the conversation, even through the telephone lines. It’s understandable. Trevor Herriot has made a career and a life’s work examining the delicate balance between nature and man in the Saskatchewan grasslands, and now someone wants to talk to him about one of the worst man-made environmental disasters in history.


Oil and wildlife mixes about as well as oil and water. Birds are birds, not experts in determining oil-contaminated areas. From hundreds of feet in the air, birds can’t tell the difference between the normal ocean and the area contaminated by the spill. So, when they dive into the water for their food, they come up coated in oil.


They can’t fly. Their feathers lose the ability to regulate their body heat. And if they try to peck or lick the oil from their bodies, they ingest the stuff, get sick and die.


The oil will also kill plants and animals that are part of their food chain.


This isn’t a local problem for American states bordering the Gulf of Mexico. The oil spill’s effect will reach throughout North America.


…includingSaskatchewan. The Gulf Coast is the winter home for many migratory birds that spend their summers in Saskatchewan — some of whom are on the endangered species list.



The biggest name to stand out — though it’s far from the biggest bird on the list — is the piping plover, a shorebird. Climate change and human development may already be doing a number on the plover, says Bird Studies Canada, because its natural habitat in western Canada — riverbanks and lakeshore marshes — are either drying up or being made unsuitable for the birds by conversion into public beaches or watering holes for cattle. Damming and draining doesn’t help, either.



Other birds who spend their summers in Saskatchewan and their winters in the Gulf of Mexico coast include the common loon, the Western Grebe, Horned Grebe, the American White Pelican, the Double-crested Cormorant, some gulls and terns and the Long-billed Curlew.



There’s also the Short-billed Dowitcher, the greater and lesser Yellowlegs, the Red-breasted Merganser and the Blue-winged Teal.



This fall, these birds will find their habitats destroyed when they return on the annual pilgrimage Mother Nature has programmed into them.



Tens of thousands will die, entire species will face extinction, and in Herriot’s words, “a biological ecosystem that took hundreds of millions of years to create will be destroyed in a month.”



Even worse, hurricane season starts in late August. Storm surges and tidal waves created by hurricanes and tropical storms that pass through the Gulf of Mexico could push the oil further inland, destroying the habitats of species that live inland.



One of the few pieces of good news in the oil spill disaster, Herriot notes, is that the leaking oil will probably not affect the nesting areas of the whooping crane. Placed on the endangered species list in 1967, the whooping cranes’ winter nesting areas are along the Gulf of Mexico coast in Texas — west of the Deepwater Horizon blowout. The Gulf of Mexico’s current will send the oil east, away from their nesting areas.



The whooping crane’s survival is remarkable not for how many are left — estimates put the number of such birds alive at about 250 — but from how far back the bird has come. At one time there were fewer than 60.



So, good for whooping cranes. Nice that one bird population won’t be devastated. Harriet is still concerned for Saskatchewan’s migratory birds.



I don’t need to tell Planet S readers that birds such as the piping plover can’t vote. They have to rely on environmentalists, naturalists, and people like Herriot to speak for them.



Good thing that someone does. Too bad they’re not listened to.



When the Saskatchewan government overhauled the Wildlife Habitat Protection Act two months ago, environmental concerns took a back seat to “getting government out of the marketplace.” In right-wing political parlance, this is called “business as usual.”



For Herriot — author of three books (River in a Dry Land,Jacob’s Wound: A Search for the Spirit of Wildness and Grass Song Sky) about the relationship between man and nature — it’s just another step in exactly the wrong direction.



“In Saskatchewan, as well as federally, there’s an increasing demand by government to streamline the environmental review process,” he says. “We should be going in the other direction. We should be taking steps to preserve what wildlife and wild lands that we have left.



“What they call ‘paperwork,’ we call stewardship,” he says.



Apparently, there wasn’t much ’stewardship’ on board Deepwater Horizonbefore the April 20thexplosion. In a May 20 report to the White House, University of California, Berkeley environmental engineering professor Robert Bea said “this disaster was preventable, had existing progressive guidelines and practices been followed.



“Other existing U.S. guidelines that were simply waived by the responsible regulatory authority could have prevented this incident,” said Bea, who heads the Centre for Catastrophic Risk Management at UC Berkeley’s College of Engineering.



“You know, I think that many people still believe, despite all the evidence about pollution, global warming, and the interconnectedness between man and nature, that the world ecosystem can take all the kinds of abuse modern industry can throw at it,” says Herriot.



“I hope we can learn from this that nature has only a finite capability to handle such abuse — certainly less than our capabilities to abuse nature.”


WGST department becomes program

Women’s and gender studies folded into new interdisciplinary initiative


VICTORIA MARTINEZ
Associate News Editor

After 18 years as a department, women’s and gender studies is transforming into a program this year.

Students will still be able to take honours, four and three year degrees in WGST, but the courses offered have changed. The focus of the program will be separated into gender, sexuality and cultural studies and transnational feminisms.

To reduce overlap with courses offered by other programs, eight courses were replaced with more current topics. Popular courses will still be offered as humanities and social science electives to arts and science students.

“The new women’s and gender studies program will continue to explore topics that span a full spectrum of issues from the intimate to the international,” department head Joan Borsa explains. The traditional focus on examining human behaviour and culture will not be affected by the change to program status.

Otherwise, undergraduate programming will not see too many changes.

“A gender-based lens is relevant to all disciplines,” said Borsa.

The WGST department has existed since 1992, and has offered a major since 1996.

The program will be the first program offered by the newly formed Interdisciplinary Centre for Culture and Creativity, which will be devoted to cross disciplinary study.

The transition will expand the pool of resources WGST can draw from in terms of faculty and research collaborations by sharing information across all the disciplines included in the ICCC. The centre will work with outside groups with more leverage than one department might be able to.

A large portion of WGST students already take minors in other fields, so the new designation will simplify that process. The program now contains seven specializations including English, economics and philosophy.

The ICCC move will also enable the program to offer a master’s degree taking advantage of other disciplines, which is scheduled to be offered by 2011. Research should benefit immediately, since the program will work more closely with other programs than the department could.

The main role of the ICCC is to encourage cooperation between fields of study, and will recruit on behalf of all the programs it contains. The defining quality of projects in the centre is social responsibility combined with cultural and creative work.

The next program to be added to the ICCC will be an MFA in writing, with reading French and courses specifically for first year Greystone scholars already included.

Monday, June 21, 2010

If one of your one say this then maybe it is true?

I think that that shine of the Haper government has coming off the armour. But if we can get out crap together and give a true opposition , The Liberal party can form government. What do you think? read this tell me?


Don Martin, National Post · Wednesday, Jun. 16, 2010

Rarely heard Conservative MP stood in the Commons yesterday to admonish MPs on their low productivity this spring.

"Not one new government bill has passed Parliament to become law," scolded Cheryl Gallant. "It is time for the opposition to stop interfering, get serious and start working."

Better late than never, a solution is unfolding on Parliament Hill. MPs are ending 63 days of all-out war over fake lakes and parliamentary supremacy with an outbreak of peace on two fronts while readying a rush of legislation forward for final votes today.

Clearly all Ottawa needs to supercharge MPs into action is to keep them on constant countdown just 72 hours from a long vacation break.

That seems to have goaded the Liberals and Bloc Quebecois into holding their noses yesterday to support a last-minute government deal on Afghan detainee documents.

Just over an hour later, all the parties did a group hug with Auditor-General Sheila Fraser and bowed to the "public interest" (which means the screech of angry voters) in allowing her to peek at a "sampling" of MP spending that they had tried for weeks to keep under a blanket of secrecy.

Neither deal should be confused with a new sense of parliamentary co-operation. This is simply what happens when the MP mind focuses on fleeing for a break that outlasts the average Canadian high school student's summer holiday by almost a month.

The detainee document deal finds a reasonable middle ground between the government's desire for all-out secrecy and the oppositions' demand for all-out disclosure. Only the NDP wouldn't go along.

Declaring Cabinet documents off-limits to MP eyes seems to go against the Speaker's ruling on the MPs' right to see all detainee documents uncensored, but they will be viewed by independent arbiters chosen by all parties, so it signals give and take on both sides. The nagging question will be timing. With documents scattered around the Kandahar Airfield or reportedly lining the bottom of shipping containers at sea, the collection, sorting, editing, legal examination and re-censoring could outlast our combat mission in Kandahar.

The partial disclosure of MP expenses was also achieved under last-minute pressure to do something before MPs head for home to face voters.

The great misperception was always that Sheila Fraser wanted a look at every purchase of coffee and a muffin, when all she actually sought was a performance audit of spending programs and budget envelopes. She did not get her way with Senators, who are still ignoring her request for a probe of their budgets. Shame on them.

But MPs can rejoice, knowing they've struck a deal at minimal risk of having any of their own personal spending irregularities exposed. Ms. Fraser will only peruse a sample of their expense claims and won't name names if she finds hard-to-swallow spending. That's like telling employees that the company bean counters will scan only a "representative sample" of self-approved expense accounts.

Even better news for MPs was learning it will be late 2011 -- just as Ms. Fraser's 10-year appointment expires and safely after the next election--before she reports on the expenses.

In both cases, the last-minute summer scramble has produced reasonable solutions to sharp political divisions. RelievedMPs have put their trash out on the curb. Now they're clear to head off the Hill.

dmartin@nationalpost.com
.

Friday, June 18, 2010

About time !

All I am saying is that it is about time it takes a help from the government to do this. Where was the NDP for 25 yrs. As this neighbourhood was dying. But Now th community assiocation has to get all the people who live in this community. Not those who have kids going to school. Also all people of all poltical strips.


Pleasant Hill plan takes initial step
Incentives play key role in community revitalization
By David Hutton, The StarPhoenix June 18, 2010 The homes on the corner of Avenue O South and 19th Street West in Pleasant Hill four years ago were, by all accounts, dying.

The dilapidated rental units beside St. Mary School contributed to the image of the neighbourhood as somewhere to be feared by those unfamiliar with it, a perception the community is dead set on changing.

"The housing was not suitable and nobody should have to live the way the homes were," said Pleasant Hill resident Ilsa Arnesen-Kun.

"For something this drastic you had to have that government intervention."

On Thursday, in their place, the first homes in the largest inner-city revitalization project attempted in the province went on the market amid hopes of a turnaround.

"It's going to be a completely different area," Arnesen-Kun said. "People are going to have different thoughts."

The stacked, energy-efficient townhouses, a unique design in Canada, include two buildings, each with 12 two-to-three bedroom units built by River Ridge and Ehrenburg Homes. The hope is low-income families will take advantage of programs to move from rental to home ownership.

"This is like we're harvesting that first tomato," said Keith Hanson, executive director of the Affordable New Home Development Foundation, who spearheaded the townhouse development. "A lot of time and effort has gone in to make the garden grow."

To get to the opening of the first home has not been without risk and heavy costs.

Not including the new St. Mary School, governments will spend $6.3 million in total on the 13-acre Pleasant Hill Village project, including $3.7 million of city money that has been spent to acquire land, then demolish the 33 single-family homes that once made up the distressed neighbourhood off 20th Street.

On the private investment side, a $14-million seniors' housing complex is being readied for 20th Street by the Knights of Columbus and more than $15 million in new housing is planned to be completed by the end of 2012.

Despite the promise of urban renewal, there was little uptake when the city offered to sell the land for $1 to developers willing to build quality homes that could be offered at the low end of the market.

As a result, the city offered to buy back any units that aren't sold at prices now between $190,000 and $240,000, described by some as a lucrative incentive that officials argue was necessary to jump-start the area.

If any of the units don't sell by November, the city must buy them and market them. Twelve of the 24 units have been sold to affordable housing corporations, which will at first rent them out.

"This is a big test," Hanson said. "When you have a whole new project and all sorts of new housing coming in, how do you know (what will happen)? What will people pay?"

The city is faced with the decision of whether to continue its incentive program on the remaining lots in the development and much hinges on how sales of these first units go, said senior planner Alan Wallace.

"We hear there's a lot of demand," Wallace said. "This will test the ability of people to visualize what this is going to be and buy into it."

Many urban renewal projects across North America have fallen back into states of disrepair after such major interventions, but all involved are betting good urban design and quality homes will not only fight off decay but that the renewal effort will spark development elsewhere in Pleasant Hill.

"This is a neighbourhood that's on the move," said Coun. Pat Lorje.

"It's changing and you can see improvement every month."

dhutton@sp.canwest.com

BEFORE AND AFTER

Land use 2006 Upon completion

Single family homes 33 0

Multi-unit homes 0 96

Seniors housing 0 75

Park space 1.76 acres 466 acres

School 3,300 sq metres 4,400 sq metres

© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix

Read more: http://www.thestarphoenix.com/business/Pleasant+Hill+plan+takes+initial+step/3169517/story.html#ixzz0rD9VLdw2

Monday, June 14, 2010

Oh Brother !

What is this all about Spearding the Consevative message to a level.

Fox News: Would you watch a similar channel in Canada?
June 10, 2010 9:55 AM |

Kory Teneycke, former Communications director to Conservative Leader Stephen Harper. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)

Is a new Fox News-like channel making its way to Canada?

Quebecor Media Inc. has filed an application for an English-language TV news network with the CRTC. Rumours have been circulating in Ottawa that the application will introduce a right-wing news channel modelled on the success of Fox News in the U.S. Reports also suggest it will be headed up by the prime minister's former communications director, Kory Teneycke.

Read more.

Would you watch a Fox News-like channel? Take our poll.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Government and private sector working together.



This is the start of bring a neighbour back to it once greatest this time Government got it right.
So why is the provicial fighting so hard against the idea of putting a food story near by ?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#6 - 315 N AVENUE S Saskatoon, SK S7M 2N2
0.8 km0.8 km© 2010 Microsoft Corporation © 2010 NAVTEQ © AND © 2010 Microsoft Corporation © 2010 NAVTEQ © AND
RoadAerialBird's eyeLabelsSee this location in bird's eye view Bing Maps 3D has finished updating


General Description
Pleasant Hill Revitalization program offers a fabulous new development by Cenith Developments. Eco-friendly, Energy Star Home, Solar panelled for optimum energy efficiency! One of kind, first to hit Saskatoon! Be excited to join the green movement and own a 2-3 bedroom townhome directly across from the new St. Mary's School in Pleasant Hill. This Brand new home features 810 square feet plus a finished basement. Units either face or back the park. Open floor plan. 2 of the 12 units are Wheel Chair accessible.
Location Description
Saskatoon


Property
Features : Treed, Corner Site, Rectangular Maintenance Fees : $0 Monthly




Building
Building Type : Unknown Built in : 2010
Floor Space : 810.0000 sqft


Rooms
Type Level Dimensions

Master bedroom Second level 12 ft ,5 in x 9 ft ,4 in

4pc Bathroom Second level 5 ft ,8 in x 7 ft ,8 in

Bedroom 2 Second level 12 ft ,2 in x 9 ft ,4 in



Family room Basement 13 ft ,10 in x 13 ft ,11 in

2pc Bathroom Basement 3 ft x 7 ft ,5 in

Laundry room Basement 8 ft ,3 in x 7 ft ,4 in

Storage Basement n/a



Dining room Main level 11 ft ,3 in x 7 ft ,6 in

Living room Main level 14 ft x 9 ft ,7 in

Kitchen Main level 6 ft ,11 in x 9 ft

Friday, June 4, 2010

Not sure What to make of the This?

As riding president I am not really sure of what to make of this news Story is true or bull shit? I gues I am Have to go the membership and Ask them?

NDP coalition talk highlights clash between Ignatieff and Rae

Chris Wattie/Reuters
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill on June 1. The Liberal leader is suffering in the polls.


By John Ivison June 1, 2010 – 9:22 pm

It’s no wonder some supporters of Michael Ignatieff are wary of Bob Rae. Mr. Rae may not always have the Liberal leader’s best interests at heart, say Ignatieff supporters, such as the advice he is said to have given last fall, to bring down the government because “you can’t be half pregnant.”

Now, trouble is brewing once more, as Liberal support continues to slide and some of Mr. Rae’s advocates openly agitate for a debate about a coalition with the NDP. One influential supporter said that if the Liberals don’t take the idea seriously, they have no chance of governing the country in the foreseeable future.


However, supporters loyal to Mr. Ignatieff are hitting back, arguing that a deal with the NDP would sacrifice the Liberal party’s history and identity.

Last week, Mr. Rae reminisced on his website about the NDP-Liberal deal he helped broker in Ontario 25 years ago. He is on the record as saying that the Conservatives are only in power because “the forces of the centre-left allowed themselves to be divided and we can’t allow that to happen again.”

Jean Chrétien added to the momentum for collaboration when he said of a coalition with the NDP: “If it’s doable, let’s do it.” Yesterday, it was the turn of the president of the Young Liberals of Canada, Samuel Lavoie, who called for federalist progressives to unite under a new banner.

On the other side of the debate is Mr. Ignatieff, who last fall dismissed any prospective resurrection of the 2008 coalition deal signed by the entire Liberal caucus. “We do not support a coalition today or tomorrow,” he said.

On Tuesday, a senior Liberal in Mr. Ignatieff’s office said the party plans on running a campaign to form a Liberal government with candidates in every riding.

Divisions have been hardened further by the addition to the Ignatieff ranks of old Paul Martin aides, like former director of communications Scott Reid. He was forthright in his opinion that it should be the Liberal party’s ambition to beat Stephen Harper’s Conservatives, “not surrender to Jack Layton’s NDP.”

“This is a merger by any other name… A slippery slope to sacrificing our political identity. It would amount to a total betrayal of the Liberal party’s history, identity and success,” he said.

Mr. Reid rightly raised some prickly questions for those hankering after some vague accommodation among the “progressive majority.”

“Would we run 100 fewer candidates? Would we abandon Saskatchewan and Manitoba to the NDP and ask Ralph [Goodale] to step down? I think the notion is absurd. The only person who advocated it was Jean Chrétien on CBC but I have a hard time believing Jean Chrétien thinks the Liberal party shouldn’t run 308 candidates at the next election.”

The battle lines are not entirely set. While many supporters of Mr. Chrétien and Mr. Rae have coalesced around the banner of uniting the left, and most of Mr. Ignatieff and Mr. Martin’s boosters oppose such a move, the narrative is not quite that neat. For example, Peter Donolo was Mr. Chrétien’s director of communications but is now heavily invested in the Ignatieff camp as chief of staff.

What’s more, it is unlikely that many of those who would favour a progressive accommodation are in favour of a pre-election pact. One of Mr. Rae’s supporters said he would rather not rule out a post-election governing arrangement, as Mr. Ignatieff seems to have done. Both Liberals and New Democrats say discussions about a coalition remain hypothetical at this point.

But as Mr. Ignatieff’s support continues to slip, nervous caucus members add the support of the two left of centre parties together and dream of government. That may be wishful thinking – not all Liberals would join a united left. As one Toronto Grit said: “Rae is fundamentally a lefty who paid $10 to become a Liberal. But he hasn’t changed his substance, only his perfume. My opinion is that it is a bad idea for the Liberals but a good opportunity for the NDP.”

Meanwhile, the NDP are happy to fuel the fires within the Liberal party. Nothing bad can come from internal Grit strife and, at the same time, the party remains in the news. “We’re front and centre. If the political discourse of this week is that Jack Layton is the only one who can unseat Stephen Harper and the separatists, then why in the world would any New Democrat want it to stop,” said a cheerful Brad Lavigne, the party’s national director.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

We Need a new Zoo keeper.

In my opinion we need a Thrid to Ref this Zoo. You wonder why everyone thinks all political party are the Same.


Spending by Sask. government and Opposition caucuses lacks transparency
By James Wood, The StarPhoenix May 26, 2010 Be the first to post a comment
•Story•Photos ( 1 )
Every year the provincial government and the Opposition caucuses recieve $2 million but it's an area of spending that remains opaque to the public.Photograph by: Bryan Schlosser, Leader-Post filesREGINA — While a major controversy brews in Ottawa over oversight of MP expenses, provincial politicians in Saskatchewan have been under a system to publicly account for their individual spending of taxpayers' dollars for years.

However, one major area of spending remains opaque to the public — the nearly $2 million allocated to the government and Opposition caucuses annually.

New rules for individual members were introduced in the mid-1990s following the misuse of MLA communications allowances that ended in the conviction of 16 Progressive Conservative MLAs and caucus workers and one NDP MLA.

Members are allowed to charge for expenses in four areas: telephone and related expenses; MLA travel and living; constituency service and constituency assistants.

They must file a report annually with the legislative assembly outlining their expenditures. That report is available for perusal by the public at the legislature clerk's office and at the offices of MLAs.

"At the time these would have been the state of the art rules in the country and still are. When other jurisdictions are looking to change their rules, they come here," said NDP MLA Kevin Yates, the Opposition's ranking member on the legislature's board of internal economy.

Yates said MLAs are restricted in their discretionary spending compared to politicians in other jurisdictions and the legislative assembly staff assigned to vet expenditures are not reluctant to flag questionable costs and withhold reimbursement.

MLAs have a limit of $42,366 annually for constituency service expenditures, which include communications, advertising, offices and furniture. Constituency assistant expenditures are topped out at $52,054. Travel allowances vary based on the location of a member's constituency, with northern members allowed the most - $83,000. The average amount is $39,300.

Saskatchewan Party board member Don Morgan said the current system allowed members to check ahead of time whether an expense is allowable and ensured disclosure took place.

"There was a strong desire for the rules to be quite strict and that people should be able to look at them at the end of the year and say 'we got good value for our tax dollars,'" said Morgan.

But while the individual MLAs must provide listings of such things as individual purchases and suppliers and all other aspects of government expenditure such as salaries and payments to suppliers over $50,000 are released in public accounts, the use of funding provided to the caucuses remains obscured.

An annual report breaks overall down areas of expenditure such as salaries and research but not details of how the money is spent.

Morgan, the government's justice minister, struggled to explain why that data has remained hidden over the years even while transparency has increased on other aspects of provincial spending.

He suggested details of caucus spending would provide information to political opponents and raise questions about "motives."

"I think by its nature, caucus is . . . very reluctant to release information that they feel could effect their ability to deal with issues in the house when they want to bring things up," said Morgan.

But Yates said he could not think of any aspect of caucus spending that would be problematic to release publicly.

He said it was probably time for the board of internal economy to review all rules around expenditure and disclosure.

Caucus funding is allocated based on the number of MLAs not in cabinet. In 2008-2009, the Opposition NDP received $1,115,835 and the Sask. Party government received $838,245.

jwood@sp.canwest.com